Contact book vs movie reddit There's no way they could do justice to a book so epic in a 2 hours movie. Movie Experience . The movies I think filled very great points in his basically nothing character arc which serve as the foundations of this shipping . Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets The Shining Movie Vs Book; Princess Bride Book Vs Movie; Top Posts Reddit . you make a good point in your comment about age/experience, and how that can . It's the same with Howl's Moving Castle (book v. The movie(s) though bring the world to life for a much larger audience which I think needs to be given some credit. Ron could have been comic relief for the movies without dumbing him down so much from the books. Movie) but I still found both endearing in their own way. The movie is a simple alien invasion/body snatcher narrative. As I am in the final 1/3 of the book, here’s what I figured out: Combine parts of the series with parts from the movies and you get an almost perfect adaptation. reReddit: Top posts of August 2018. The moment in the wardens office when he puts the opera over the sound system; you can't FEEL that properly on paper. The Exorcist ending: book vs movie . In general the first movie had some okay stuff and could be a decent popcorn movie it’s just nothing like the book. This is typical of any movie that is based on a book or any movie that is based on a true story. Very real about movie Ron. If any of you have the opportunity to visit Forks or just the PNW in general, I highly recommend that you go experience that “vibe” because it really does I’m not talking about comparisons of movie adaptations vs original books, but as two artforms in general. The way the recovery happened in the book was absolutely perfect. I feel like the film requires you to read the book before, because it bland without a lot of the context. My attitude towards it was similar to 'The Shining'; after finishing the book, the movie lost a lot of its I am so upset over this movie because this book is amazing and had so much potential to be a good movie. I saw the movie first and was disappointed. Fans of fantasy, science fiction, horror, alt history, and more can all find a home with us. . the book is good, like all his books, but the movie was something special. i have read the books/watched the movies a couple of times since my obsession ended but it’s back in full force for me currently too 😆 it’s crazy timing It's really a great reminder of the kind of sci-fi I hope that Interstellar and Tomorrowland will make popular again: an optimistic, magical film experience. And I found the book to have much necessary depth to the characters and everything than the movie did. I saw the movie first then read the book and to be honest I thought the movie was really good till I read the book I agree they took out a lot of importance information but I’m happy they got rid of a few things like the side story about valentine and her older brother and the stupid slang but what I missed most was the progression of all the characters and the fact that ender had already Book Snape was a shitstain who went out of his way to antagonize Harry and coddle Draco, often doing things that made you wonder if there was any oversight to speak of in Hogwarts. I also like the character arc in the movies better. Hello guys, got 'The Martian' book as a gift from a friend a few days ago and I didn't even know this existed until now, even though I saw the movie tbh that's almost every single movie adaptation out there. But the movies made Harry more intelligent and more mature, and even gave some of his uninformed "dopey" lines to Ron. Viggo's performance is brilliant. I had seen No Country For Old Men the movie (literally) over 50 times before reading the book. There was a really interesting and well thought out article I read a while back about movie vs. Kind of reminds me of, I dunno, most movie translations? I know that this comment was probably meant to be taken as hyperbole, but honestly, I wonder if this is just a lot of people's first book or something, as there are very few book to movie adaptations that are anywhere close to 1:1. Order of the Phoenix, the biggest book by a large margin, is also the shortest movie. When it comes to book v. I understand his redemption arch and see why people claim him to be a hero, but in my opinion based on the books, Snape is a total j*rk who bullied Hermione for being a good student, threatened Neville with killing Trevor, threated Harry with poisoning him and so on. Miyazaki never takes the full concept --he takes snippets and creates an alternate reality with the same title; using books as inspiration rather than fact. Submissions should be for the purpose of informing or initiating a discussion, not just to entertain readers. With movies, everything is spread very thin Obviously, you don't need millions of dollars for actors and CGI when writing a book. Widely considered one of the greatest works within the sci-fi genre, Dune has been the subject of various film and TV adaptations, including the Academy Award winning 2021 film Dune directed by Denis Villeneuve. i read everything palahniuk had written after i watched fight club. to know what's later book material vs movie nonsense. Welcome to r/HarryPotter, the place where fans from around the world can meet and discuss everything in the Harry Potter universe! Be sorted, earn house points, debate which actor portrayed Dumbledore the best and finally get some closure for your Post-Potter Depression. These things are partly because the movie-Ring is more powerful and starts being a major weight sooner and because Book I is greatly abbreviated. TLDR: I watched part of the movie as a kid, but don’t recall the plot at all. So, 'Misery' played on AMC earlier. The themes the movie goes over are still valid and the the film is not dated like many mid-90s films. In the book it was Marietta Edgecombe who snitched on them. it's always subjective, but i thought it was both well-written and genuinely disturbing. It’s been 20ish years since I read the book, but iirc, in the book Hadden suggested to Ellie to adjust the frequency modulation or something like that and the primer revealed itself. So, without changing the plot, they changed a couple of character names from the original names to ones Hi everyone, I just finished reading Dune and I wanted to ask which one you liked best, the movie or the book? I don’t know if it’s because I watched the movie before reading the book, but I thought the plot was much improved by Villeneuve by eliminating unnecessary plot lines and characters and adding the divisions between the “believers” and the skeptics as well as giving View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. It’s not even an adaptation of the book it’s a different storyline entirely for no good reason Book Draco was really appalling especially early on, faking the extent of an injury trying to get Hagrid sacked/Buckbeak executed and getting SO much pleasure out of it, the way he used literal slurs against Hermione, mocked the Weasley's poverty at every chance and even brining Harry's dead parents up tauntingly it's almost nauseating what an evil, entitled git he was. Personal experience with seeing the movies first and then reading the books: I could really feel like Katniss was a teenager in the books, compared to a full grown Jennifer Lawrence. Don't get me wrong the Doctor Sleep movie was good the ending left me wanting but overall both book and movie are great sequels. It was also my first experience of reading a book worse than the movie, I believe, so it stung even more. If the book was a 4 out of 10, the movie was like a 4. Definitely read the books. com's gateway to all things Horror: from Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Once you finish the book, you can have a LOT OF FUN with a "2002 movie-roast" evening. I read all the books and watched all movies after. i didn't love the movie, but i REALLY enjoyed the booki think it depends on how much the storyline appeals to you. make it into a mini-series or something like that. Especially when it comes to translating a book into a movie. reReddit: Top posts of July 2023. reReddit: Top posts of 2023   I loved the book and hated the movie. It's not that I expect every book moment to be there, but there are so many smaller moments where Ron tells Malfoy to shove off, defending him from Snape, or even telling Hermione to lay off Harry. i mean the director for catching fire & mockingjay 1&2 really didn’t have a choice because the first director didn’t set it up for him. 5, maybe a 5. but in my opinion, there is a limit to how much you can change the story and still call it an adaptation, and the movie crosses that line several times over. in the book, jack bludgeons his own face in with the roque mallet right in front of danny before going to the boiler and burning deep grooves in his hands while trying to "dump the press" by turning the red hot valve. But one must be the fact that District 4 wasn't a Career district in the film. Looks like Kloves was a "kloveseted gingerphobe" *maniacal laughter . In the book, Snow is excited when he sees Sejanus and jumps up and hugs him. Shawshank is one of the most faithful book to screen adaptations I’ve ever seen! There is some extra character development, and a couple things happen slightly differently, but other than that, it’s a I love both the book and the movie, but the changes Steven Spielberg made really highlights just how excellent of a storyteller he is! All of the changes helped establish a dynamic and balanced cast of characters and worked in service of tightening and strengthening the narrative. I actually felt like, if they tightened up the editing on the rest of it, the movie could have been significantly longer and still hold together. But look at book/movie lengths. You have to cut so much content(for time) to be able to tell the same(ish) story in a movie. I second this. movies, can't. I cannot find anybody talking about this, and as I recently reread the book and re-watched the movie, it yet again struck me how different Mitch is in the book as opposed to the movie, anybody has some quote or article if this was a The movies don't make a single bit of sense on their own, but they knew that didn't matter because in the mid-2000s everyone and their mother had read the books anyway. Movies Vs Books posts Reddit posts talking about Movies Vs Books used in the summary. Which was Danny. I think this is simply due to the complexity of the topic (contact with aliens) and that there is simply no such thing as a universally fitting Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. IT Pts 1&2 are decent horror movies that happen to share a title and basic premise with one of King’s most popular novels. Welcome to the ultimate destination for Rambo enthusiasts! 🚁🔥 We're thrilled to have you as part of our community. I’m a newcomer to the wild ride of James Bond. Dune is a landmark science fiction novel first published in 1965 and the first in a 6-book saga penned by author Frank Herbert. There's always going to be people that will almost always say "the book is better", because, well, it usually is. Honestly, the whole Sejanus/Snow relationship in the movie seemed off. Members Online aerozera As much as I love Peeta's character in both the movie and books it bothers me a lot how they did Peeta in the movies. On par with Interstellar in my opinion. Book book book book book book. movie, I agree - adjusting one's perspective is necessary. I can send it your way if I ever find it again! Dune is a landmark science fiction novel first published in 1965 and the first in a 6-book saga penned by author Frank Herbert. The books are better imo plus there is a couple prequels too, won’t spoil the books but a lot of the BIG things that are in the movies are in the books and vice versa but they miss A LOT, the closest relation between the book and the movie is the first movie and even then there is so much difference, one thing I will give away is that Thomas Because in comparison, book!Ginny is a badass compared to movie!Ginny. Aragorn is challenged throughout the movies and arises to said challenges a good leader and these events change how he views the crown and his desire for it. I think if you are interested in the story, you are best served by the book, and then watch the movie with an open mind, and an awareness that it is a somewhat abridged and limited You're basing that on the movie, the book has some rather significant differences. In retrospect, it was a convenient move for the producers because (1) D4 girl in the 74th Games was too forgettable to be a Career anyway (her death didn't affect Katniss whatsoever) and (2) D4 was shown to be a rebellious district even in the book where they were supposed to be Capitol I like book Snape's character much more than movie Snape (though to be fair, I feel that way about all the HP book characters vs. For more than a decade /R/HORROR has been reddit. The whole thing's so self-indulgent and campy. When changing the medium with which a story is told, there will always be things that is different. No desperation to see him again in the movies which is so central to Harry's character development in learning about death. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Examples of movies being better than the books? r/books. Yes, i started reading the book recently and i expected to be just as in love with it as the movie but it honestly just makes me appreciate the movie even more. The goal of /r/Movies is to provide an inclusive place for discussions and news about films with major releases. I’d like to know other people’s opinions on this. Some users preferred the movie, appreciating its visuals and pacing, while others found it lacking in depth and character development compared to the book. Whether you're a die-hard Rambo fan or just starting your journey with the iconic character, you've found the right place to share your passion, discuss the movies, and connect with fellow fans. Reddit . So yeah , while Draco was basically a side and small time antagonist character in books with one dimension, hardly any arc . the only books I've got (and read) are Divergent and Insurgent, and I was thinking of watching the Allegiant movie instead of buying the book/looking for it in a library, but I've heard that the movie is very inaccurate, is that true? Dune is a landmark science fiction novel first published in 1965 and the first in a 6-book saga penned by author Frank Herbert. The book was creepy (the phonecalls made my hairs stand on end), but it was also a take on loneliness, awkwardness and loss of hope for change. With books, there is only the writer. I get that his insight and comments can't all be reflected in the movie because they're very omnipresent in the books, but to summarize I would say that they took all his knowledge growing up in a wizarding home and gave it to Hermione to make her a know it all, Redditors' opinions on Ender's Game Book vs Movie are mixed. The first Hunger Games movie is a less Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Discussion of the show, pictures from the show and anything else. movie portrayals). Gaming but I remember Frodo being pretty oblivious as compared to the movie. Beregond is an amazing character that isn't mentioned in the books who accompanies Pippin in Minas Tirith. Obviously, both mediums have their strengths. Absolutely not, there's just a swarm of more here that haven't read the books (and likely many that don't ever intend to) Not 100% sure I agree the books are any less childish, the writing remains very simplistic throughout, but I agree the themes are so much more important, the stories are also more original as each HTTYD movie is more or less the same plot but with different viking Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. However, if you’ve seen the movie, I’d prepare for a drawn out detail of the movie while reading the book. Maybe that’s what king was going for so you could empathize with jess I didn't like the book, and also didn't like the movie. Obviously, after I finished the book, I went to the movie expecting to be disappointed. reReddit: Top posts of June I felt like the movie removed all of Parzival's agency. I mean, she was Harry's love interest after all. yep, for all these reasons and more, the movies are kinda a ridiculous adaptation of the book. In the book he discovered the way to the first key, in the movie it was "someone". book Ron analyzing why the writers did what they did for the films and how that fundamentally changed his character, not necessarily for the better. The book is one of my all time favorites and while I enjoyed the movie I've only seen it once so it's a little difficult for me to compare. What are some things that books are better at doing than movies? r/books. The book brought everything together. But even without watching the movies and just reading the books, Ginny should have had more scenes and her development should have been a bit more on page. Halloran is a bigger guy with an Afro but his personality is much the same. In the book he hatched a complex, hare-brained and daring scheme to infiltrate IOI and get out with the data he needed to bring them down, in the movie Art3mis gets captured and they break her out. There was a really great pair of books I read a while back, starting with "Children Of Time" and there is a point raised in the second book which I was initially uncomfortable with until I thought about it. Can’t mainstream a movie written for that For example, I was surprised to see how different the ending of The Shining was from book to movie, and curious if the same could be said for IT. Edit: Don't worry about the adrenaline rushing storyline when the park drowns in chaos! And in the book, hes really only that, whereas in the movie he shows remarkable heroism and nobility. It's a sci-fi movie with a slow build-up that totally pays off and totally surprised me with how much I liked it, personally. It is our intent and purpose to foster and encourage in-depth discussion about all things related to books, authors, genres, or publishing in a safe, supportive I loved early New Moon Jacob, but his character gets worse as the books go on🙃 The Eclipse movie kiss scene was pretty manipulative, but it’s definitely worse in the book. Ludicrous action sequences, irrelevant sidequests, and stupid conspiracies take the movies away from the title character, and instead make it about an over-the I like both but movie Aragorn just edges the win over book Aragorn. The movie is better, but only in that it has amazing actors in it. These small details and characters make the book an amazing read. Books can take more time and show you a character's thoughts where you can't do that very well in a movie. im surprised that others are commenting that the book is more detailed and vivid and-keep in mind im not yet finished w the book- but that seems like an odd statement. i’m likely in the minority here that i read the book shortly before the film was released in 1993. For a lot of viewers it felt Contact is often used as an example of a movie better than the book, and I’m here to fix this injustice. reReddit: Top posts of April 8, 2020. Particularly in the first few books, Harry and Ron are goofy, young guys, who say and do stupid things. The book took four people and returned with Proof, as good as the movie was the book had no “faith” construct. ), reading fanfics, etc. in the movie, he seems annoyed with Sejanus being there. In this way, the character is the same in the book and the movie. i seen the movie and read the book so many times i jumble them together at times. I thought the movie drastically improved the dialog between characters. Rickman is an amazing actor, and he did an amazing job playing Snape if Snape had been a suave, debonair, sarcastic, morally gray hero with gorgeous hair. true. Danny was showed Lucy. Contrasting 'Misery': Book vs. This is really what makes it so egregious. Like when he fears Harry may know about the horcruxes. No fault to Rupert Grint, who is a wonderful casting for the part, but the writers seemed determined to give all of Ron’s good lines and moments to Hermione instead in the books, sure, Ron is still an immature teenager, but his actions make a lot more sense to his character and he has his great moments. It is one of my favorite movies (I was in my 20s and lived alone with no cable - I rewatched certain movies countless times 😆). Yet they couldn't spare a few scenes to make Ginny a character? Prisoner of Azkaban was the second shortest movie, yet it cut out a OOTP movie is incomprehensible without having read the book. After you read the book you will ask yourself how did they get that movie from this (the director never finished the book by his own words. We'll also talk about how this Jodie Foster space We’ll go over the Contact movie plot, the Carl Sagan book, and talk about how the author of Contact saw his vision come to life on the big screen with Zemeckis’ superb While it may have made sense in the book, it didn't translate as clearly in the movie. A lot, really. However, that scene ruined everything that the book and movie had set up to that point. The only McCarthy book I had read at the time was The Road. The main themes of the book seemed to have been swapped out for the director's adaptation. Better to go into the movie knowing that it is a much more compact, edited version of the book where the screenwriters will leave out details that prove important to the reader or will take creative liberties with the story and/or characters. Reply reply More replies The ending of Contact also reminds me a bit of the ending of Prometheus. Many users enjoyed the movie as a standalone sci-fi film, particularly Asa Butterfield's performance as Ender. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets Howl's Moving Castle Book Vs Movie; Differences Between Paperback And Hardcover; Top Posts Reddit . The book leaves it all open ended, the book lets you form your own interpretation, or encourages your interpretation to be the terroir of all of the unexplainable in the book, forming no conclusions but having and understanding. I love magic and the Wizarding World and can never learn enough or read enough about it whether is learning new things that didn't know before (spells, backstory, characters, etc. I read everywhere that one book to movie change people are mad about is that Cho is the one that snitched on DA in the movie. The entire time span of one book is a full school year whereas the Hunger Games is like 2-3 weeks so it’s much easier to include a lot of the details. I really feel like the movies killed Ron and made Hermione and Harry too perfect. Not everything has to be over However, after doing a reread, a lot of the actual dialogue from the movie came straight out of the book so I think for the most part, the books were translated into the films very well. i like the book and I thought the movie was so great at capturing the events of the book in way that worked. movie tacked on the whole "believing what she saw is Movie Harry will tell Movie Ron to do something that Ron volunteered to do in the books. The movies are just a checklist of scenes book fans would have wanted to see on-screen, instead of actual attempts to tell coherent stories. Ron gets really shafted in the movies to be the oafish comedic relief. A lot of little moments where Ron defends Harry are omitted. Ullman is more of an asshole in the book, whereas in the movie much isn't known about his personality and comes across as a nice guy. Plus Dr. Movies . the book made the park feel like a real place and gave the reader some great The Martian, book vs movie Mitch Henderson I am unsure whether this is a right subreddit, so sorry if not. This subreddit is a space for the Tolkien nerds of reddit to debate and discuss the whole Tolkien mythos. Death on the Nile is a very definite example - it is my favorite In order to stretch a three hour book into nine hours of movie, PJ added in unbelievable amounts of bloat to the movies, almost all of which directly contradicts the tone of the book. We emphasise serious discussion here over jokey/meme-based posts. Often times for movie purposes they slightly change the plot of the story or change the facts of the persons true story for time constraints. But if there's anyone here who loved the movies more than the books, please share! Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. but ugh! it’ll always frustrate me. He's also not as wise and worldly as the books, where he could speak Elvish. That said, I would say the movie does a pretty good job of staying pretty faithful to the book and does as well at coming close to the same sort of tone as can be expected. Redditors' opinions on Ender's Game Book vs Movie are mixed, with some praising the movie adaptation and others criticizing it. Like where Danny saw the crib as a child, but no child came into their family. And no movie Snape portrayal of the book snape would have been the same character, period. The movie adds a few Hallucinations and leave others out. if he thinks it's impossible to turn it into a movie, that's fine. However, towards the end of it (spoilers ahead) there's The book also holds an advantage that most books hold over movies -deeper character development. Extending the Hobbit out to three films, however, spreads out the material too thin to keep the plot driving forwards, and that's why Jackson felt the need to add an entirely new enemy. The Rep from India returned with Proof. Sure, a few of the plot-points from the book that the cut for time make later points make less sense (Watney's whole 'I'm a space-pirate' logic doesn't work, considering he never lost contact with NASA), but it's entirely forgivable. idk that’s just how i felt. Completely agree. reReddit: Top posts of March 31, 2022. The book is always better. " Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I was in love with the movie when it came out and read the book when I discovered the film was based on it One, his actions in the book and the movie are, in the scene you seem to be referring to (Shrieking Shack in PoA), very much the same. She’s a familiar character. In the book, Joss makes great points on why people turn to religious In the 1997 movie "Contact", do the aliens take active steps to assure no modifications to the machine? The main differences between the two versions stem mostly from the characters: changes in personality, and omissions in general. but i definitely agree with edward and bella’s relationship not developing enough in the movie since in the book they’re always talking and asking each other questions. Contact went from an exciting sci-fi mystery to something that could almost be described as fantasy. In retrospect the movies did Peeta dirty in almost every comparison to the book. Also like you said, the book description is haunting (you can search Voldemort book description on google, you'll see what i mean), while i never got that feeling with the movie Voldemort. Even Cho got more development! I actually liked the movie better. My favorite characters in the book that aren't mentioned in the movie is Beregond and his son, Bergil. Another couple quick examples that first racked my brain was how much more effective the book was in giving clues about Barty Crouch SR's behavior whereas the movie focuses more on the minute details of Barty Crouch Jr's mannerisms. When Chigurh retrieves the money at the motel, he hides from Bell in the movie, whereas in the book, Bell doesn't get that close to him. I actually hate the movies because they're TOO different, it's like they're not even the same story. reReddit: Top posts of August 13, 2018. Always the first on the charge and the last to cover the retreat, and very appreciate of his comrades loyalty: "Honour, a willing heart - I can ask no more than that. A book can take more "time" to develop a complex character (paper's cheap, so a few more pages isn't much of a constraint) while movies can't always His rage is shown to be uncontrollable in the books, but his own fears arent highlighted in the movies. It's impossible to portrait so many charaters' character development in a 2hours movie, and most of all, I don't see how they could portait the final chapters of the book in a movie. Allegiant Book Vs Movie . The movie just hits your senses in a way that transports you. If IT the novel was Desperation, IT the movie was The Regulators It wasn’t just the obvious changes (the house on Neibolt, The Ritual of Chüd, Henry’s “Anakin-esque” decent into madness) or even the weird changes (Mike’s entire character, Richie’s i agree agree fight club; the movie is exceptional. The movie conversation with Dumbledore is terribly bland. The movie changed 3 scenes, though, that made Chigurh look completely different at the end, and I think they did a brilliant job at this. In the movie she has been a character since year 4. Welcome to r/HarryPotter, the place where fans from around the world can meet and discuss everything in the Harry Potter universe! Be sorted, earn house points, take classes with our fine Hogwarts staff, debate which actor portrayed Dumbledore the best, and finally get some closure for your Post-Potter Depression. The Harry potters adaptations deserve a bit more leniency. The book does a better job of hinting at someones odd characteristics than the movie was at SHOWING them. Thoughts on movie vs book after rewatch of Annihilation R/HORROR, known as Dreadit by our subscribers is the premier horror entertainment community on Reddit. If it wasn’t attached to the Percy Jackson brand it maybe could have been more its own thing and could have done okay. Sleep answered questions from the Shining. The biggest difference between movie and book. Usually books are held in higher regard (seen as more intellectual, more sophisticated, more important etc) than movies. if you find the topic/concept interesting, i think you've got a good shot at enjoying the book. r/booksVmovies: A place to discuss and debate books and their film counterparts -- novels, comic books, movies, and TV shows! View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. exe* Everyone's character was sacrificed for Harry's emotional maturity and Hermione's whatever goddess the movies made her(I still laugh when I see the canaries movie scene, or the Scabbers fight), sometimes I wonder what would happen if someone who was more a Weasley/Harry/Neville fan directed the The 'breeding incident' is a major part of the book, whereas the movie only mentions it for a second. if this is how much the story needed to be changed to make a movie, id rather them not make it The book, just like the movie was revolving around the love triangle between Linnet, Simon and Jackie, but there were other important elements in the book that made the ending less tragic than the movie's ending. And he doesn't turn Joss into some dumb evangelist either. This is a moderated subreddit. the movie. The largest and most important change to any A book is essentially dialogue plus narrative; a movie based on the book could, if the screenwriter/director chose to, use all the dialogue, or selected parts, but the narrative can We'll go over the Contact movie plot, the Carl Sagan book, and talk about how the author of Contact saw his vision come to life on the big screen with Zemeckis' superb direction. I think Twilight at least makes some nods to it with her joke about being kicked out of Arizona and her self-deprecating attitude towards slipping on the ice, but in general, I think the movies ended up sacrificing character for plot. The author cowrote the screenplay, and you can tell. In the movie they've only known each other for a week. I decided to read this series after watching Twilight's movie trailer. I’m not saying it wasn’t a great book, because it is. This includes his height and build, charisma, strategy, cleverness, skill, strength, maneuvering abilities and overall IQ. they've got a time limit, paragraphs and paragraphs of dialog take too much time, scenes take too much time, to really do most books justice, in like 2-2 1/2 hours. I've read the book, and I definitely prefer the book over the movie, obviously. I like details in a book but the 300+ pages it took to get the story weren’t necessary. It was much less focused on religion, multiple people went into the machine at once for the trip, and at the The book is much better for how Sagan used Palmer Joss to draw out a discussion on the subject. i think it has a lot to do with what was consumed first. i think thats way scarier than frozen jack nicholson but different strokes for different folks i suppose. Maybe an unpopular opinion, especially since so many posts on this sub seem to focus on the movies instead of You are correct; the movie is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike the book. The book does a great job bringing the whole world to a close in one go, obviously they wanted to expand because there is a second book, but just the first alone could serve as the whole world of JP. If you enjoy cinema that deals with alien contact, religion, how society would cope with that contact and human relationships this movie is for you. I know people can have their own opinions for how good the book of something is compared to its movie adaptation, but I think of the book as absolute, and what should have the more believable details to it rather than the movie. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets Movie Vs Book; Movies Adapted From Novels; Top Posts Reddit . Carl Sagan’s sci-fi novel Contact tells the story of a radio astronomer struggling to keep alive her ahh yes!! i will never understand why they chose not to. i feel like the love triangle didn’t make a lot of sense in the movie cuz you don’t really see how much bella and jacob need each other. Visually the 3D primer was much more effective storytelling than if Totally agree! I love Book Bella, and I so wish the movies could've captured her sense of humor. reReddit: Top posts of Hello dino fans and welcome to the final discussion of The Lost World, where we will compare it to The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997), directed by Steven Spielberg!I think it is fair to say that this adaptation diverges a lot more from the source material than Jurassic Park did, and even threw in a few things from the Jurassic Park book that didn’t make it into the first movie, so I’m The book vs movie characters are all drastically different. It was a pretty good film, the zombies were especially terrifying, but it was definitely not the same as the book. r/books. there was a lot that i was looking forward to going into the theatre that just wasn’t there — and i’m not just referring to dinosaurs and action sequences. i had seen the movie before and really enjoyed it but i knew it had been misconstrued by film bros as patrick being something to aspire to and look up to, so i wanted to read the book to get the true essence of the character and honestly i feel the book did such an amazing job at building up his character. Idk if What point is the veil if he's hit with a killing curse. Until recently the only references I had to Bond were the movie Skyfall, and Golden Eye on the N64. The hotel walls are actually blue in the book. I’m fine reading a long book but not when it feels drawn out and boring as a reader. but that’s also what i love about the movies bc it makes them a hilarious “summary” that barely scrapes the surface of the book, A community for the quality discussion of The Wheel of Time series of novels by Robert Jordan (& completed by Brandon Sanderson) as well as Amazon's streaming adaptation, the first audiobook recordings by Michael Kramer & Kate Reading, the second audiobook recordings by Rosamund Pike, the graphic novels adaptation by Chuck Dixon & Chase Conley (and continued by Rik View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. That said, beyond things that I've come to expect from adaptations like cutting/combining characters and plotlines, I think the biggest difference is in tone with the movie being more romantic. I'm curious to hear about other thoughts about the differences between books and films (whether experiential or technical Read and bought every book when was released and saw every movie when it was released in theatres. Between the lower investment and the wider distribution of power, it's much easier to get a book published than The movie needed to have its own ending, and a fab cinematic one was created - one that could only exist in the movie anyway even if the book had had the same story otherwise. This community is devoted to the world of the Hunger Games, a series of books by Suzanne Collins and hit movie adaptations, soon to include *The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes*. reReddit: Top posts of March 2022. Just not a fan of Kubrick's interpretation. although the Reddit posts talking about Movies vs Books used in the summary. It would’ve been better to follow the format of the book and show someone interviewing different survivors and we seeing their stories - even better if they were different ones from the book or expansions of some the side stories mentioned (hello, the The difference in the scene in book and the movie is stark and way more effective . We get an in depth look at Paul and his slowly unraveling psyche, with some bonus material devoted to delving into his addiction to the pain meds. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. That is one thing I like about books; they're more democratic. You will also read about events taking place outside of islar nublar That's it for now. ) The movie is a fun popcorn movie, but the book is a deep discussion of the military and the personal rights a citizen can have with out defending those rights. Movie Snape was a greasy asshole but didn't act in a way that would be deemed reprehensible by any other professor worth their salt. Plus peak Jodie Foster and a young, Matthew McConaughey. Scott and Ramona's relationship is more involved and more meaningful, and when she leaves before the last act it's even more devastating to Scott. there was proof from the camera on her head recording static for hours, at least in the movie adaptation. I really like both the book and the movie versions of The Exorcist. Two, given the information he has, his actions in that part are entirely correct and even commendable – feeling hatred for a (according to what he knows) mass murderer who betrayed one's former best friend has most plausible movie depiction of what contact with aliens would be like. By reading the books, you get a more detailed version of the movie. This is the Science of Fiction. I also feel like the whole love triangle was dialed down a lot in the movies. An adaptation of The Hobbit filmed as one or even two films would have had more than enough dramatic tension to sustain a great story. Or check it out in the app stores but contact-less interaction that symbolizes longing and loneliness. reReddit: Top posts of January 23, 2023. What actually happened is that some guy wrote a screenplay called Hardwired, and the moviemakers realized that it would be more marketable if people thought it had something to do with Asimov. For example if you tell someone (not cinephiles obviously) you read a lot of books you’ll usually get a different Also, his carefree Hobbit-ness is over very quickly, and he doesn't really have a sense of humor like the books. It's obviously worth reading the book if you enjoyed the movie. books can take their time, meander. The biggest change between the book and the movie is that the book takes place over more than a year. That said, there is no music in the book. Rereading for the first time in 20 years. They completely changed EVERYTHING in the movie. Movie Frodo and book Frodo seemed the same to me in respect where they were equally opposite in character personalities but at ends enough to equal What you see in the book may not be exactly what you see in the movie. I have no problem with most of the casting, but Linnet Ridgeway did not suit Gal Gadot for me. The book is so amazing and it’s wild how much I’ve forgotten. reReddit: Top posts of June 24, 2019. a high speed slow motion camera could pick up more detail in the disappearance, if it was a clear shot available for that moment. You expect a great "truth" that is nicely coherent and suitably rounds off the movie and then you are bitterly disappointed. the movies don’t explain any of the characters well at all, and without the depth, the story makes much less sense imo. The Shining Movie Vs Book; Top Posts Reddit . Recently I’ve taken to listening to Ian Fleming’s books and there’s something I’m kind of confused about. And no Nearly Headless Nick. i recently just finished the american psycho book, i absolutely loved it. Valheim; Genshin Impact; Minecraft; Book Versus Movie; Movie vs Book; Michael Crichton Books; Books With Good Movie Adaptations; Books Adapted To Movies; Top Posts Reddit . conversely, choke is probably my favourite book but the movie, despite a great performance from sam rockwell, doesn't hold a candle to it. Overall, I think the movie was very faithful to its source material, and it's probably one of my favourite films. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. reReddit: Top posts of July 25, 2023. Book seemed like it had drawn out too long. I feel like that makes perfect sense for the movie. For the first time I found myself disappointed, almost shocked by the lack of side stories and “imaginary” detail. A sub-reddit for the fans and critics of the show It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia. So, I’ve read all the books and have seen the movie twice (which should say something because I almost NEVER read the book before I Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The movie made to where the hotel got what it wanted anyways. r/Fantasy is the internet's largest discussion forum for the greater Speculative Fiction genre. Sirius's death and the aftermath are what make book 5 truly beautiful. I haven’t read the book though, and am just curious of people’s opinions of the book vs. He was the one of the three who had actually grown up knowing he was a wizard, so he knew aspects of the wizarding world the other two didn’t. Books vs. inematography was cool, but I thought that the movie felt smaller in scope than what it needs. Movie Bella barely seems phased by the kiss compared to book Bella. Gaming. Watch it with a notebook and make a note of all the places where it goes off the rails and has zero resemblance to the book! I don't recall the book mentioning chess or chess pieces. It is our intent and purpose to foster and encourage in-depth discussion about all things related to books, authors, genres, or publishing in a safe, supportive 45 votes, 23 comments. The Book vs The Movie . But some of the worst parts of Wade's character were changed, so you might like it more than I did. A three-hour Ender's Game that really took time to establish the characters' arcs and sell the mental breakdown that Ender's going through the whole time, would probably have worked better than the I read it long time ago but pretty sure bunch of people went in the end and whole "everyone thinks it was fake" bit existed because Sagan didn't want to give readers shit for not buying in to existence of aliens but he still wanted to write a book about what first contact could look like. I I have always been very confused as to why people liked Snape so much. Plus wanted to see Hinny ever since reading I think that with Boromir's character, it comes down to the old "books vs movie" issue. As everyone’s already said, movie Ron is a terrible adaptation of book Ron. Plus with the way a big blockbuster like that was marketed, didn't help. I'm not sure how much flak I'll take from this, but I really despised the Children of Men novel, too. adfir uiitvk nlb vame wzxuvp aeesma vehqt rum vdehye aajdp