Snapraid vs unraid. The data pool setup alone would make me use unraid.

Snapraid vs unraid Actually, unraid has pricing tied to exactly that - the drive limit. SnapRAID provides data protection through snapshot Network Attached Storage (NAS) solutions are essential for home users, media enthusiasts, and businesses looking to store, manage, and protect data. I have been using zfs for a long time. If I knew more about how to use actual Linux, I would definitely be going to ZFS route. I even recovered a drive a few weeks ago under a dual-parity setup prior to the official 6. Just set up the NAS of your choice in a VM on Proxmox, personally I like SnapRAID and mergeFS which gives me all the benefits of Unraid vs Ubuntu Server . I have about 8. SnapRAID unRAID FlexRAID ZFS Btrfs Storage Spaces; Redundancy model Real-time computes parity at real-time like RAID, snapshot at request time, like Backup. Photo by Claudio Schwarz / Unsplash. Proxmox cannot natively run Docker containers, but it can run LXC containers. Snapraid scales to 42 drives + 6 parity drives. Schüler. TrueNAS/unraid can’t do clustering at the host level. Maybe BTRFS is better but I don't know Hi, I’m trying to understand how Unraid works exactly under the hood. I can even convert them before I place them in the Unraid if Unraid cant handle the conversion so why wipe them? Is this like Oracle's ASM where you put a header on the disk? Ideally, I should be able to move the disks between the two platforms without an issue. You will have a much larger support system with unRAID. In the past i always had a good experience with Unraid and don't think that Snapraid/ZFS or other solutions would be an great fit for my needs. mergerfs + snapRAID 打造适合家用的低成本 NAS，不需要买那么贵的群晖和 威联通 。这么好的方案，没有看到有人在回答中介绍，我这里写一篇吧。 这么好的方案，没有看到有人在回答中介绍，我这里写一篇吧。 This would lock up the system. See the sections beneath the table for discussion of these points. I'm sorry for raging, I'm just super annoyed at how quick this came up and ultimately it's just my fault. Snapraid inside docker with /mnt/disk# or /mnt/user mapped through. It allows you to use a bunch of random HDDs to store data with some redundancy, but Not really. Yes I started experimenting with the trial for Unraid and wasn't super thrilled. unRAID and Storage Space have no integrity check at all! FlexRAID is at least able to report silent errors, but not to fix them. I'm quite happy with it. SnapRAID requires much more RAM for larger filesystems. I like my current Windows 10 setup, and I'd prefer not to bring up a dedicated NAS or unraid box. The best known others are: unRAID - Commercial and OpenSource GPL2 solution. I have 12 x 3TB plus 2 x 6TB in a 7 x mirror vdev configuration. It seems like Snapraid has some theoretical advantages over mergerFS for UNRAID (6. dziring; Sep 7, 2012; Off-topic; Replies 1 Views 3K. They finally released v. ) Reply SiGNAL748 Because my Amazon Glacier backup does not seem to be supported by unRAID and running a OSX VM in any way on a unRAID box seems very unlikely. I’ve been looking into different solutions, such as Snapraid, mdraid/mdadm, ZFS, Btrfs, Synology. SnapRAID/MergerFS/etc. If you didn't want to go with UnRaid, the latest version of Ubuntu LTS (Long Term Support) will get you started right. Unraid is known for flexibility and allows adding disks of various sizes over time, maximizing storage use. It's a FreeSoftware application released with the If you're looking at non-striped parity (which for a home server, imo is the only way to go), Unraid is a far better solution than Snapraid IMO. If its just data storage and pooling that's got you considering OMV vs. Unraid – Network-Attached Storage Device. g. My unraid server runs as virtuell machine in my VMware cluster. The price I pay for ZFS is worth not having Snapraid ：和 unraid 系统不同只是一个软件工具，同时也提供了 Windows 版本 (没有 webUI) 。 Snapraid 的校验并不是实时进行的，需要配置计划任务进行同步校验，而针对静默数据的问题， snapraid 可以周期性地擦洗 Building a plex server: Freenas vs unraid . So many options, so hard to decide. I was able to find that the minimum needs to be 1GB and maximum should not exceed 32GB. Or did I misunderstand snapRAID's SnapRAID calculates parity to recover data if a drive fails. The data/parity setup is much simpler to get going on unraid, as compared to the mergerfs/snapraid setup on OMV. In short, SnapRAID read your data (without changing it in any way) and it writes a parity file in a dedicated disk. I could get my hands on a old Mac Pro with plenty of storage bays, install OSX and my favorite backup program and run the whole data share/parity thing unRAID also do via the competitor SnapRAID. Big differences between unRAID and traditional raid systems are: Parity is always on a specific disk (or a specific second disk in the case of dual parity). SnapRAID是用于磁盘阵列的可用非标准RAID解决方案之一。 其他最著名的是： •unRAID - 商业和开源GPL2解决方案。具有实时冗余功能的Linux Reiserfs文件系统的修改版本。不支持完整性校验和。 •FlexRAID - 用于Win Hardware Differences: Unraid vs. I also have 2 6tb drives (also Raid 1)for other files, games, etc. My hope is that once I get ZFS configured, scrubs and repairs are just a matter of clicking a button. 2 with official support for it. It's great imo. Or I could stick with NTFS and go the Snapraid route. I went from five 2tb drives to a few 8tb and 10tb parity. Hi all, I'm running SnapRAID and mergerfs due to I have mixed disks sizes. if your after performance i would go truenas, personal use Unraid. However, I have purchased 5x 4TB drives and was planning to create a second RAIDZ (or RAIDZ2) array but now I'm thinking about unRAID and SnapRAID. Snapshot based parity for a bunch of data drives. all of that came much later, all of it its just a wrapper around open source projects you can use on any other Home Media Server Operating System: OMV vs Unraid. With a good hardware based controller that would be another story. If you’d like to use a Synology NAS, your options are extremely limited as you can only use DSM (Synology’s So maybe look at snapraid with mergerfs. I'm debating whether to go with RAID-5 on the Intel motherboard controller, or switch to something like StableBit DrivePool (or Storage Spaces) along with Snapraid for parity protection. Hello guys! I've been running a Proxmox home server like a year or so. My current setup is a gaming PC running windows 10 and I would need the raid solution to be installed on top of windows (not instead of). It also offers Snapraid vs Flexraid (traid)? Help looking for experience / thoughts comparing the two so I can decide which route to go down. mrbilky. RISC-V (pronounced "risk-five") is a license-free, modular, extensible computer instruction set architecture (ISA). OMV is based on Debian Linux and boots from a USB. It was a VERY cheap rig for firing up once a month to take a backup of my main UnRAID box (a Pentium G2130 with 16GB ECC RAM, Supermicro board, etc, etc. NTFS vs. Linux: Free and open-source, but your time investment can be substantial. I installed backports to addresses the issues that I had with Clevis and firewalld. Snapraid does one thing and does it well. UnRAID, looks very simple to set up and maintain but looks like finding a working USB flash is hard and it Related topics on forums. I've heard nothing but great things about it. 24TB usable I'm using UNRAID which isn't the same but very similar concept and it takes me 12 hours to rebuild a drive in a 24x2TB with 2x2TB parity. dedicated server booting windows from SSD hosts data and Plex server. I'd also be interested in the other benefits of Unraid/Ubuntu being a lower profile OS as I only use the current setup with Prowlarr, Radarr, Sonarr and a Download/FTP Client. Since SnapRAID is not offered, I am preparing for ZFS. EXFAT vs. All of these features make Rockstor a compelling Unraid free alternative. UnRaid Proxmox is more powerful when it comes to more advanced vm features, like snapshots, clustering, etc. They work well together to replicate a similar type of " JBOD parity" system as unraid uses. Yes 近几年在这里或者其他地方都很少看到snapraid的身影了，unraid和zfs倒是热度比较大。 但是unraid好像不支持矫正静默错误，外加个人不太喜欢外插u盘的做法。 OpenMediaVault + SnapRaid: 6) I read that SnapRaid is for large media files that change infrequently, and I have about 60GB of My Documents folders etc with thousands of smaller files unRAID takes much less involvement and with notifications is very much so set and forget. Unraid vs SHR? I am interested in a NAS setup that allows me to use hard drives of varying sizes without having unallocated space. 特别是DOCKER使用方面，社区的DOCKER模板基本能够达到开箱即用的目的，但我最终从unraid切换到了truenas scale是由于其拉跨的文件系统性能，unraid使用的是snapraid，设置方面非常简单，但是其文件调度非常不适合高并发或者持续吞吐，首先snapraid限制了本身的io为单盘 Got a bunch of spare drives and want a single volume with some redundancy? I take a look at 4 different software RAID solutions and compare the speed, usage The difference is that the purpose of SnapRAID is to be able to recover a disk to the saved state after a complete disk failure. Followers 2. 5TB (3x4TB WD Reds + 1x4TB WD Red for parity) worth of data (mostly just tv/movies), and I was wondering what would be the eas Snapraid is really more suited for your specific situation and by reading the snapraid website you would know differences like: Maximum speed from your hd (compared tot realtime parity) This is why i also don't get the guys with unraid. Les fonctionnalités de base de ces systèmes sont extrêmement similaires, ce qui signifie que vous créerez des dossiers partagés et y accéderez sur votre réseau. As i've ordered my gear i'm looking into the USB drive that is required for unraid. By Frostyfruit April 2, 2023 in General Support. Each 07 has its own usecase. So you really shouldn't be trying to compare them against each other as they can and often are used together. It provides a lot of information. For Drivepool, I wouldn't bother with folder / pool duplication. I previously had 38 data drives with 6 parity drives with sizes ranging from 750GB to 4TB. One thing to consider, however, is I think you're better using some form of backup or snapshots so if a file or files get corrupted, fat finger Also, do check out Unraid :) If you are interested in Unraid vs Snapraid, I could share what I learnt. 5, both IPVLan and MACVlan are still an option. Originally designed for computer architecture research at Berkeley, RISC-V is now used in everything from $0. Whats a little bit of pain to setup (my netword card drive is not on proxmox yet) but i'm thinking to switch to Unraid. mergerfs is a union filesystem geared towards simplifying storage and management of files across numerous commodity storage devices. Overall though I find unRAID to be the snazziest. The data pool setup alone would make me use unraid. The OP asked if there were any similar alternatives to unRAID. I have done both and have liked both solutions. XFS Suggestions on ideal filesystem for backup usb drive (unassigned devices) NTFS vs. SnapRAID is very appealing because most of my data doesn't change (ie. 27 minutes ago, BAlGaInTl said: The difference is that the purpose of SnapRAID is to be able to recover a disk to the saved state after a complete disk failure. But for me, I was thinking about XFS on Unraid with ability to scrub w/ BTRFS for my cache drives in Unraid. This isn't that bad, though. Synology due to the way that Synology devices must be purchased/used. Also, Unraid doesn't stripe files, which for me is a huge plus. Other possible factors: OMV is free but unraid has a cost $60 usd. Traditional RAID has the speed advantage, but it isn’t as flexible. I mean, you can basically replicate Unraid "manually" via MergerFS and SnapRAID (to an extent; SnapRAID parity protection needs to be manually updated, so is only really practical for rarely changing data) and in fact I ran MergerFS with simple data duplication instead of parity protection for years. Since Unraid is a premium OS, you’ll need to purchase a license and activate it to use the operating system after the initial 30-day trial period. This is great for archival situations SnapRAID requires much more RAM for larger filesystems. Unraid, ive been running it for 6-7 years at this point and have two machines running 24x7. Unraid and TrueNAS serve different needs for most users. Also with unraid or something like SnapRAID even if you lose more than your parity can support, you can still recover what is on the surviving disks. com for thread: "ZFS vs SnapRAID vs unRAID vs FlexRAID vs disParity vs Storage Spaces" Similar threads Locked; ZFS vs. Unraid runs from a USB stick so you don't need to dedicate a sata port to the OS drive. There is a significant difference when comparing Unraid vs. The main difference between them (except all the secondary stuff like ui and stuff) is that unraid syncs on the fly while snapraid syncs on command. Primarily intended for home media centers with large, infrequently changing files, SnapRAID offers several features: You can utilize disks already filled with files without the need to reformat them, accessing them as usual. txt file in the Windows download. Synology Hardware. There isn't a singular way to look at it. I prefer RAID vs. XFS. 2 release (there were betas and release candidates with the feature). After testing for months, I finally got to the data migration phase. Reply I read on the snapRAID website something about the way that parity works in different software RAID solutions. It's a FreeSoftware application released with the UnRAID is in between real RAID and DrivePool. I’d use Unraid and setup a windows VM for gaming use, keeping the drives Hi all! I have a long-running media server (built in 2015!) that I use for file storage, an Emby server, plus related media download and management apps--Sonarr, Radarr, sabnzbd, etc. As mentioned above, Unraid is a Network-Attached Storage (NAS) operating system. TrueNAS/Unraid are NAS OS that can also run VMs and Containers. We’ll look at some differences below. I personally recommend SnapRAID for higher fault tolerance because you can have one parity drive per I've been running dual-parity drives on unRAID for a few months now. i5-11400 with built in igpu (which the newest upgrade to unraid made that just work, no tinkering vs older versions), 32GB Ram, 2TB NVME for dockers, 2TB SSD for cache, 1TB unassigned hdd for downloads (most auto move to the Cache after but some i like to sort ahead of time, depends on what it is). It is not magic it seems to be. This is how you can have two different docker containers think they are using the same port internally, but that they are seen as different ports Proxmox vs UNRAID . ZFS's expansion still has an issue which is that the space efficiency Hi all, I'm looking to setup a 16TB external hard drive on my unraid server as a backup. The main difference with other solutions is that SnapRAID stores also integrity checksums at block con - can't grow and keep data duplicated at all times, but I can add snapraid to this config unRaid has lots of useful plugins con - will need to migrate all data one at a time con - wont have duplicated data, but not a big deal if its protected Performance wise with the shit hardware I was using there was very little difference. I personally use unraid only as storage and with plex container as media station. I personally use DrivePool + Snapraid, but I have a host running Windows Server and a DS4486. ZFS, was "do I want to use someone else's management style for my system" but Unraid seemed "hands off" enough When I learned about UnRAID I figured it was a much better solution for me instead of un actual RAID 5 because I can use different size drive and then I found out I can do the same thing with open media vault using snapRAID and Unionfs. From what I understand, that is the biggest difference from Snapraid vs Unraid, along with the fact you must schedule syncs in Snapraid (hourly/etc). 10 CH32V003 microcontroller chips to the pan-European supercomputing initiative, with 64 core 2 GHz workstations in between. SnapRAID is for providing redundancy like a raid and mergerfs is just to allow arbitrary pooling. Locked; FreeNAS vs Windows 8 "Storage Spaces" okwei; Nov 22, 2012; New to FreeNAS? It means that docker still uses the hosts IP address, but that there is a mapping (bridge) between the ports as seen inside the docker container, and the ports these are mapped to at the host level. It While it can detect errors due to checksumming, it does not have a method of fixing these errors in unraid, specifically because unraid is using it on singular disks inside of the unraid array so those features would not be feasible. truenas. Yes SnapRAID most likely will perform better vs a RAID6 software implementation in writes. 6. I'm thinking of switching everything over to unRAID for a easier experience. Reaktionen 2 Beiträge 75. I don't have a dog in the fight as I currently have my media server setup with SnapRAID and have a second backup server that mirrors that server. Synology. Using OMV along with the snapraid and mergerfs plugins allows you to set up the same type of JBOD raid using different size drives (largest drive size has to be used as a parity drive to be able to be able to compensate for a same size or smaller drive in the array until the failed 本期视频我们用较大的篇幅来介绍另外一种磁盘阵列技术SnapRAID，它在RAID磁盘阵列和备份技术之间取得了很好的平衡，当下热门的 unRAID 使用的也是 If SnapRAID+Unraid was offered, I would probably go that route (all the benefits of Unraid+what I want from ZFS/BTRFS without the disadvantages). It syncs parity on the fly with a host of other advantages. SnapRAID + MergerFS This combination is a flexible alternative to Unraid, especially if you need a customizable storage solution. Unraid only scales to 28 But the only alternative for parity is snapraid and its not real time. Different file systems and RAID (or Unraid) types all have pros and cons depending on your view. 10+) A plugin that installs mergerFS, a featureful union filesystem, onto UNRAID systems. Unraid storage It also gets zero performance benefit from using multiple disks, and unlike snapraid ,btrfs or zfs it does not verify data integrity. But I still have questions about Unraid. Summary at the bottom of the article. The only way you can compare them as similar is that SnapRAID does have a basic readonly pooling feature but that isn't really the same. writing to a raidz1 has the same 1-disk bottle neck on i/o ops. I can't recommend unRAID enough. Using Plex again, you use a standard Plex docker image (though one with a few tweaks for Unraid), then launch the Raid 1, Unraid, Snapraid? Help I currently have 2x 8tb drives RAID 1 for Plex library, but out of space. The information I came across suggested that with unRAID if one of your files becomes corrupt somehow you basically can't fix it with unRAID. Proxmox vs. with Mergerfs and snapraid --- it doesnt offer the performance boost of raid or zfs but you can pool your disks together and have parity disks (though it's not Realtime you I believe Unraid, Stablebit + Snapraid, and Storage Spaces w/ Parity are all about equivalent in terms of write speed. . Unraid vs TrueNAS inside a VM MergerFS + SnapRAID vs. Posted April 6, 2019. I have not considered BTRFS, as I want to run something which is similar to Unraid/Snapraid's parity ratio. Has the issues with Kernel Panic been resolved using MACVlan on Unraid? Key Comparisons Cost. jgreco. By madbrayniak August 24, 2020 in General Support. If all you're looking for is parity with individual drives like Unraid does, most of that can be handled by SnapRAID, and you can get a fairly nice interface with OpenMediaVault, which has support for SnapRAID (and MD-RAID, and ZFS, and JBOD). Mergefs will let you stack all your disks together but your i/o will be limited to 1 disk at a time. Members; 461 2 Posted April 6, 2019. SnapRAID published a helpful comparison Proxmox vs. Proxmox is a Hypervisor OS which aims to have similar features as ESXi (and other enterprise Hypervisors). There are also links to descriptions as to which situations to use each one. Unraid will allow you to pick the best file system based on your needs (XFS or Btrfs To get more details about SnapRAID you can check the snapraid. There is no special registry setting nor does it install anything to run in the I take a look at 4 different software RAID solutions and compare the speed, usage space and other features of these solutions. For my first attempt at using a NAS OS I went with Open Media Vault . snapraid gets you a lot of the benefits of zfs without the hassle of raid. 0:00 Intro 1:14 Unraid 2:45 BTRFS 4:21 SnapRAID appears to deliver at a happy medium ground where you can maintain integrity similar to raidz [1,2,3], but at a reduced frequency. Plex server in windows with snapraid, unraid or TrueNAS or even Storage Spaces? Help -unRAID vs a true RAID NAS - The ability to use any combination of sizes/makes of drives and the ease of adding additional space are imo, what makes unraid one of, if not the best option for a ever growing plex library SnapRAID is a backup program designed for disk arrays, storing parity information for data recovery in the event of up to six disk failures. UnRaid, then the only thing that matters is Snapraid. If you want, use a SnapRAID disk as an extra level of protection, plus with regular scrubs it will protect against data corruption. Snapshot: Real-time: Real-time Snapshot: Real-time Snapshot: Real-time Snapshot: Real-time: Integrity If data is validated with some kind of checksum, and which one is the default. How much does it cost? Nothing. On the other hand, SnapRaid focuses on data health, rather than high availability, with block level checksums; at the cost of 'timed' snapshots. . With numerous software NAS options available, choosing the right one depends on various factors such as ease of use, expandability, redundancy, and budget. However, after good use and extension of the trial, I ended up going Pro for Unraid. What's with this 30 drives limit? Why 30, exactly? If unraid can successfully protect 5 or 10 or 28 drives with the same double parity, why not more? What's the difference, anyway, 28 or 48? UnRaid vs. I installed Timeshift to snapshot my build before upgrading. For most of these systems, I think, I have a reasonable understanding of how they work. XCP-ng Impressions. Luckily, from what I can tell, BTRFS has a method for relatively easily figuring out which errors were found so [操作疑難] SnapRAID vs UnRAID. I really want to use freenas since unraid is paid. The ideal scenario is that this is used encase unraid goes down. You have to do your own checksums and verify your own backups\test restores. 11. I moved them with data into Open Media Vault and SnapRaid without issue. SnapRAID fits my goals of data protection (integrity, bit-rot) and flexibility in mixing drive sizes perfectly. ZFS . I see multiple SnapRAID containers on Dockerhub but none are available in the unRAID App store SnapRAID unRAID FlexRAID ZFS Btrfs Storage Spaces; Redundancy model Real-time computes parity at real-time like RAID, snapshot at request time, like Backup. omv was more set and forget and free! Zitieren; drdownload. left that I want to try and that is to try and setup a Linux Distro with Cockpit for WebGUI as my server and maybe SnapRAID as the file system. While Proxmox will allow you to install a NAS OS as a virtual machine, everything must be done inside of that NAS VM. Proxmox can. TrueNAS: Free for both Core and Scale versions. A modified SnapRaid basically consists of a small executable and require just a simple configuration file. This server is based on Ubuntu 18. FlexRAID. As such, apparently MACVlan was going to be removed from future versions of Unraid. Which means silent corruption can and will go unnoticed. SnapRAID is compatible with the "light" expandability philosophy of Unraid and therefore much more generally compatible with the system such that bit-rot becomes a non issue while also facilitating recovery (even if bit-rot doesn't occur) at any given time based on frequency of the execution of SnapRAID. Unraid is more a energy saving optimized NAS with a little bit docker and vm support. UnRaid focuses on uptime, with less regard for data safety. I've been running Unraid for only a few months but have been impressed by parity and the adding of different drives. 20 HDD of various sizes between 10TB & 14TB. Unraid and Storage Spaces have on the fly parity whereas Snapraid needs to be regularly scheduled. Unraid +Easily expand storage in the future +Easy to setup +Easily add dockers-Only 6 drives-Costs $60-Slow speed Truenas +ZFS is very resilient +Free +Speed-Can not add additional drives to current vdev-Needs more RAM than Unraid In Unraid plugins and applications are very much different things (though they can still work like OMV, and in fact that's how they used to work, before docker). In terms of read speeds, Storage Spaces is by far superior. Unraid: Paid licenses starting at $59 for basic setups. XCP-ng Impressions UnRaid vs. Sep 19, 2012. 80% video/media, 20% other) but I'm concerned about the problem of deleting files before a sync and then losing a drive causes Differences Between Unraid and TrueNAS. Honestly I can't believe how Hi All, I currently have my home server running Debian with SnapRaid+MergerFS. copy old disk 1 to new disk 1 , parallel with old disk 2 to new disk 2 etc. 04, and I have been using Snapraid + MergerFS to pool an assortment of odd driv Can say that historically, any of the users here who have moved from unRaid to snapraid (and there have been several, including myself a number of years ago) all wound up back at unRaid. Everything else - vm's, dockers, community apps. Unraid is basically an entire Linux based OS with a GUI for managing storage, support for When you use file level raid-like implementations like snapraid or unraid you get easy expansion with all the downsides you already noticed (though unraid hides them better they are still SnapRAID is only one of the available not standard RAID solutions for disk arrays. FreeNAS Hi! Never used freenas or unraid, this is my first media server. But, I see that even in v6. If profits are not the reason - remove the limit on the Pro licence. UnRaid is a slackware version of Linux, it's highly customized and offers strong GUI support through a web portal. Followers 0. But it's a lot more work to Mount your SnapRAID drives as unassigned devices (as far as I know, SnapRAID and unRAID are pretty similar in the sense that each disk has its own file system) Run parallel sessions of cp between disks <-- this is where the time saving comes from e. I have now since SnapRAID unRAID FlexRAID ZFS Btrfs Storage Spaces; Redundancy model Real-time computes parity at real-time like RAID, snapshot at request time, like Backup. Our comprehensive guide compares TrueNAS vs Unraid vs Proxmox to answer your question. It's honestly a chore if you keep anything important. Snapraid is not raid, it is a quasi-backup solution. O. 玩開S, 諗住近排想用舊既ITX機換個機箱DIY部多部平平地既機, google過下 unraid好似唔錯, 望下又見 snapraid 好似差唔多, 想問有冇人兩隻都有玩？邊隻會方便d? snapraid 諗住係win10度用, 定有冇其他更好方案? 唔該大家 Conclusion : Unraid vs TrueNAS Dans cet article, nous avons examiné Unraid et TrueNAS pour essayer de déterminer quel système d’exploitation NAS vous devriez utiliser. vs. Though one would need ability to feed through commands to execute inside the docker container from unraid unless snapraid has a webui too. This was one reason it took a while to decide on Unraid vs. Bonus is that it's Debian-based. Docker. Its not a performance based system with all of the configurability of RAID like Storage Spaces or other RAID systems. ogz wxngc movjicnu brxmtl hgroe pazi zodcr lbex ryctfzi wbt wup wojk qmnf rhrbdsp gahwv